Showing posts with label - Aviation Reads. Show all posts
Showing posts with label - Aviation Reads. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Singapore- To Do (25Mar25) Interairport SE Asia at MBS

Singapore - To Stay
Singapore - To Eat
Singapore - To Do

Interairport SE Asia @ MBS
Fun free to enter exhibition that shows you the companies behind the much seen things around airports and contracts they have with Changi.
*Interesting concept. The talk is done in Vietnamese but they have live audible translation/subtitles via the QR Code*

The vendors who have contracts with Changi Airport. 
*Some of the Greenery in the airport T2/T3 are maintained and supplied by SINGRASS*
*Seemed affordable at USD30/sqm for high durability high-pile carpets till you hear the minmum order. That's where they get you.*
*Area lighting from the UK. About 150K USD/Post.*
*Beware of Jet Blast. A basic panel goes for about 120K USD*

*The good people at Mastermark who do more in-depth studies on Bird strikes for Changi Airport. Looking to the bird's diets and working to target reduce and make Changi a less desirable place for these birds to come to. Dawn and dusk are the highest risks for a potential bird strike to occur. Really great insights and wonderful sharing to the more detailed and good work these folks do.*

Some of the more interesting products that companies are pushing for to increase productivity and thus reducing costs.
*Reducing engine cooling so that the necessary checks and
maintenance actions maybe done by the ground crew. 120K USD/unit*
*Sustainability*
*FAA Approved 3D Printing for parts replacements. Reducing minimum order requirements and shipment and time lag between.*
Familiar and fun to see up close. 
All-in-all good fun and would recommend to register to explore for any aviation enthusiast. 

Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Aviation Reads - KSA (Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes)

Disclaimer! This is NOT an opinion piece, but rather a collection of various readings and clippings which serve to spur further exploration in the topic. These are not full articles but simply excerpts from the bulk of reading material that is available.  As much citation and references were taken with regards to the topic. Legitimacy and accuracy of the clippings are read at your own discretion.

Area 100 KSA (Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes) is a new training approach in the ATPL theoretical training, that aims to teach pilots vital competencies that were not previously addressed by traditional subjects. KSA does not have an associated official exam but is instead assessed at the ATO level.

The name “Area 100” comes from the number code that EASA gives to the ATPL subjects. Ordinary subjects go from 010 (Air Law) to 092 (IFR Communications), and KSA has been assigned number 100.

Why has Area 100 KSA Been Developed:

EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency) data shows that approximately 50% of licensed pilots have insufficient competencies for employment, and therefore fail AOC assessments. Single-choice examinations do not verify if the answers come from rote learning or from understanding.

Moreover, flight crew errors, and specifically a lack or poor application non-technical skills, are one of the primary causes of aviation accidents. Its importance as a share of total accidents has been steadily rising for decades, as aircraft have become more reliable and complex.

To tackle this issue, Area 100 KSA addresses the need for holistic, output-based training which develops and assesses the pilot’s competencies. It is a shift in pilot training to a competency-based training environment.
(Click here for the 8 Competencies)

Area 100 KSA differs from other learning objectives (LOs) in the verbs used: Show and demonstrate. Its syllabus has three main objectives:

  • To firmly embed competency-based training in ground school.
  • To provide an effective bridge between theoretical knowledge training and flight training.
  • To encourage the development of the ‘thinking pilot’.

These objectives are reached through involvement, using learning by discovery and scenario-based learning, embedded in real-world situations.

The training philosophy behind this could be then summarized as “Involve me and I learn”, shifting from passive learning to active learning.


What will KSA mean for future pilots?

As a pilot, you will receive better training and be more competent, since your knowledge will be based on reasoning and not pure memorisation. You will therefore have better chances of meeting airline requirements and securing a job.

On the other side, airlines will be able to choose from a pool of highly qualified pilots that have been trained using best practices and have demonstrated vital ICAO core competencies, and flight schools will show commitment with the best training standards and its ability to adapt to changing requirements and regulations.

Aircrew operating at the basic level have the necessary knowledge, skills and attitudes and exhibit a textbook-based performance. With additional motivation, knowledge and experience, aircrew can move up to the superior level.

Here,
aircrew do more than simply follow standard operating procedures — they use foresight to anticipate problems and use higher-order skills such as situation assessment, judgement and problem solving to take a proactive rather than reactive approach to situation management. The demands of modern aviation necessitate that aircrew attain a superior level of airmanship.

At the highest level, is the desire to achieve excellence in all aspects of performance. Those operating at this level are dedicated to self-improvement and have a genuine desire to perform optimally at all times. Aircrew operating at this level seek airmanship excellence and this manifests itself in outstanding performance.

You might also be interested in Tony Kern Airmanship Model

In Conclusion:

Within the aviation comm
unity, there are many definitions and concepts of airmanship. It is our contention that airmanship is logically defined as a personal state that enables aircrew to exercise sound judgement, uncompromising flight discipline and skilful control of an aircraft within a situation.

There are se
veral indicators of effective airmanship. Primarily a good airman is someone who prevents things from going wrong by maintaining situational awareness, using foresight to anticipate potential hazards and making sound plans that take them into account. However, it is perhaps easiest to see effective airmanship in action when problems arise.

Then, e
ffective aircrew correctly assess the dynamic situation, apply sound judgement and take decisive and appropriate action. In doing so, aircrew manage the available resources and prioritize their goals; demonstrate good discipline and strong teamwork, communicate clearly to all appropriate agencies, and employ comprehensive knowledge and considerable expertise to the situation.

Whilst it is tr
ue that airmanship is a personal quality, and that individuals do vary in their natural ability for it, aircrew can be trained and motivated to achieve airmanship excellence through application of the Foundations of Airmanship model.

Airm
anship training centres on the building of three key skills of judgement, control and discipline using a defined series of knowledge and skills. However, airmanship is more than having the requisite skills and knowledge; it is about having an appropriate attitude and a desire to perform optimally at all times— this personal conviction will enable aircrew to attain the highest levels of airmanship performance.

Outstanding airmanship can only be achieved by placing airmanship training at the very heart of a training system rather than as an adjunct. An holistic approach to airmanship training is essential to enable aircrew to meet the new and significant challenges of modern aviation. 

Sources:

Thursday, April 29, 2021

Aviation Reads - Hollnagel's 4 Cornerstones of Resilience

Disclaimer! This is NOT an opinion piece, but rather a collection of various readings and clippings which serve to spur further exploration in the topic. These are not full articles but simply excerpts from the bulk of reading material that is available.  As much citation and references were taken with regards to the topic. Legitimacy and accuracy of the clippings are read at your own discretion.
Click here for More Aviation Reads

Resilience in Aviation
After the German Wings 9525 crash in 2015 in the French Alps, a survey of pilots mental health was conducted among nearly 2000 pilots in the US and Europe. The results were then published in the Environmental Health journal in December 2016. One of the findings showed that 12.6 % of the pilots were on the threshold of clinical depression. The survey cast light on a reality distorted by taboos and the preconceived notion of what pilots are supposed to be like. Pilots, of course, are no different from other people, and they do experience the same ups and downs as everybody else.What is resilience and what does it mean for pilots?

In 2016, Resilience Development became an European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) requirement in Crew Resource Management training. But what is resilience, and are we able to actually train pilots around the world to be more resilient?

What is Resilience


*Pic source https://www.forestlyn.com/blog/2020/4/26/the-resilient-mindset*

Resilience is a psychological term that came about in the 1970s.

After many years of talking about stress management, resilience might be the new term used for pilots to cope in an industry that is changing more rapidly than ever before. Resilience implies being prepared not only for what you are trained but also for unexpected (black swan) events.

The Hudson River incident showed a crew of high resilience, faced with the unexpected. Having procedures and checklists incoherent with the actual situation and yet being able to bounce back in a calm competent manner, despite the huge time pressure and high stress load. Every day there are situations in aircraft around the world that demonstrate crews of high resilience, we just haven’t heard about them because the catastrophic outcome was prevented.

The Four Cornerstones of Resilience
(Hollnagel,2009)

*Pic source http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:694400/FULLTEXT01.pdf.*

You might also be interested in Hollnagel's Safety1 and Safety 2, what goes right instead of what goes wrong. Click here for full write up.

1. Anticipating
1.Anticipating – Knowing what to expect. How to anticipate developments and threats further into the future, such as potential disruptions, pressures, and their consequences. This is about the potential as one moves forward in time.

*Photo source https://www.baamboozle.com/index.php/study/62826*

Anticipating is about staying ahead, looking toward the future for possible failures, and sense making, or retrospective and prospective processes of data framing, re-framing and anticipatory thinking.

Those that are
successful in anticipation while engaged in safety-sensitive tasks can detect signals amongst the constant flow of information that signal a potential hazard, and this early recognition offers a head start on developing a course of action to resolve the emergency before it even happens.

However, our expectations and use of heur
istics (i.e., mental shortcuts) can create biases and blind spots in our understanding (Fischhoff, 2003; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). Resilient individuals avoid this trap by frequent re-assessment of the cues provide to them.
You might also be interested in the Perils of Multi-tasking.


2. Monitoring
2.Monitoring – Knowing what to look for. How to monitor that which is or could become a threat in the near term. Monitoring must cover both what happens in the environment and in the system itself.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.osmaviationacademy.com%2Fblog%2Fworking-in-a-multi-pilot-environment&psig=AOvVaw2EcchWCgd61mp9Eg-WFueD&ust=1619746514935000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAMQjB1qFwoTCKDftZCoovACFQAAAAAdAAAAABAT

Monitoring, or detecting early signs of a problem and taking appropriate actions to prevent further degradation, is a key element in preventing abnormal situations from occurring (Mumaw, Roth, Vicente, & Burns, 2000).

The ability to monitor system states can be managed by eit
her a single person, such as in general aviation flying, or with a more team-centered approach like a flight crew. The goal is to recognize, be flexible, and cope with that which could become critical in the near term (Hollnagel, 2009).

What makes monitori
ng difficult is not the need to pick up subtle abnormal indications against a quiescent background, but rather the need to identify and pursue relevant findings against a noisy background (Mumaw et al., 2000).

Monitoring is a
cognitively challenging task for humans (Cuevas, Fiore, Caidwell, & Strater, 2007; Loukopoulos, Dismukes, & Barshi, 2003). Monitoring is a resilient skill because it helps to increase anticipation (early warning) and facilitate early response, hence improved allocation and use of resources (Lay, Branlat, & Woods, 2015).

3. Responding

3.Responding – Knowing what to do. How to respond to regular and irregular disruptions and disturbances by adjusting normal function.

https://www.pinclipart.com/pindetail/TThThT_collection-of-not-following-high-quality-not-following/

The ability of a system to respond to risks or threats is a fundamental feature of any type of system, resilient or otherwise. In order to respond when something happens to a system, the system must be able to detect, identify the risk, and rate the level of seriousness of the risk (Hollnagel, 2009).

What can make responding difficult is that we cannot predict or plan for some
risk types. The ability to steer our system’s safety when encountering challenges depends on our perception of the cues we are using to determine the nature of the current threat or risk, and how we should best respond to it.

Because humans have the capability to circumnavigate rules
when required, it can actually lend flexibility and adaptability to the system. In fact, there are some cases where intentionally not following the prescribed procedure is a better option (Dekker, 2001).

4. Learning

4.Learning – Knowing what has happened. How to learn from the experience, in particular, to learn the right lessons from the right experience.

Learning, to be truly meaningful, requires planning in how to best understand what others have experienced and how those operations relate to the current situation. When considering learning as part of the four cornerstones of resilience, it should not be conceptualized as the last step in this process—learning forms the basis for the ability to anticipate, monitor, and respond (Hollnagel, 2009).

A resilient system must be able to learn from experience. Learning can also
take place on the flight deck when the event is in progress. However, to simply say that one should learn is not enough.
You might also be interested in Hollngel's learnig Safety1 and Safety2. Click here for full write up.

Tuesday, April 13, 2021

Aviation Reads - The 8 Competencies

Disclaimer! This is NOT an opinion piece, but rather a collection of various readings and clippings which serve to spur further exploration in the topic. These are not full articles but simply excerpts from the bulk of reading material that is available.  As much citation and references were taken with regards to the topic. Legitimacy and accuracy of the clippings are read at your own discretion.
Click here for More Aviation Reads

8 Core Competencies for Flight Crew
ICAO, IATA and IFALPA agreed on a set of 8 core competencies for flight crew covering all phases of a pilot’s career, encompassing selection, ab-initio training, assessment for skills test, recurrent training and evaluation

ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization:
The International Civil Aviation Organization is a specialized agency of the United Nations. It changes the principles and techniques of international air navigation and fosters the planning and development of international air transport to ensure safe and orderly growth.
IATA - The International Air Transport Association is a trade association of the world's airlines founded in 1945. IATA has been described as a cartel since, in addition to setting technical standards for airlines, IATA also organized tariff conferences that served as a forum for price fixing.

IFALPA - The International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations is a worldwide association of national pilots' associations. IFALPA was founded in 1948 and is based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
 

The phenomenon of “competency”. Why is it important? Why is not enough for a pilot to just follow the instructions and simply complete a task after task? And, on the whole, how is it related to safety? The links between all these are direct.

A fully-licensed commercial pilot does not necessarily mean a competent commercial pilot able to properly operate in the multi-crew environment.

A pilot educated only through the task-based method is not enough for the industry today. A professional without relevant competences mastered up to a certain level is not enough to ensure the highest quality and, most importantly, enhanced safety in dynamic aviation.

Thus, who is a competent pilot then? Definitely, it is the one greatly juggling all the technical knowledge. But, it is also the one prepared to professionally apply these technical skills in absolutely unexpected, sometimes stressful, situations.

Considering a number of such examples and analyzing the way pilots react to extraordinary situations it became clear that there is a need to check if existing pilot training approaches and methods adhere to real conditions in the cockpit, if training programs are not outdated and bring true value.

Consequently, it triggered the following conclusion: in order to properly handle “human factor” in various extraordinary circumstances, technical background has to go hand in hand with the core competencies.


These were not made up just for fun. Each of the competencies was presented after thorough examinations of pilots’ performance, reasons and circumstances of minor/major accidents. These competences is the result of continuous safety analyses carried out by the experts.”


8 Core Competencies for Flight Crew
"A group of related behaviors, based on job requirements, which describe how to effectively perform a job and what proficient performance looks like. They include the name of the competency, a description, and a list of behavioral indicators."
In layman terms, the definition means that the core competencies are the areas a professional pilot should master. It is clearly defined how a pilot should behave and perform in order to be successful in his/her career and be able to contribute to continued high level of safety for air travelers and crew across the globe.

- Problem Solving and Decision Making (PDM)
Accurately identify risks and resolve problems. A professional pilot should use the appropriate decision-making processes.


- Situational Awareness (SAW)
Perceive and comprehend all of the relevant information available and anticipate what could happen that may affect the operation.

- Communication (COM)
A pilot should demonstrate effective oral, non-verbal and written communications, in normal and non-normal situations.

- Leadership and Teamwork  (LTW)
Leadership involves teamwork - and the quality of a leader depends on how successful the leader is in building relationships with his team.

- Work Load Management (WLM)
Manages available resources efficiently to prioritize and perform tasks in a timely manner under all circumstances. The most important thing for a pilot to prepare for are the next two things.

- Application of Procedures (APP)
Identify and apply procedures in accordance with published operating instructions and applicable regulations, using the appropriate knowledge.



- Aircraft Flight Path Management - Manual Control (FPM)
Control the aircraft flight path through manual flight, including appropriate use of flight management system(s) and flight guidance systems.

- Aircraft Flight Path Management – Automation (FPA)
Controls the aircraft flight path through automation, including appropriate use of flight management systems and guidance.

EBT vs traditional crew training

*pic source https://www.flightglobal.com/global-warning-honeywell-enhances-the-egpws/72753.article*

For decades, the content of flight crew training programmes remained unchanged, according to regulation. Training curricula included repetitive exposures to a set of prescribed events, which, as technology evolved, became highly improbable with modern aeroplanes. In addition, these events were mainly examples of negative performance and we just expected crews to learn effectively from them. In some cases, we learned what NOT to do but rarely what could or should have been done to change the outcome of the event. (You might also be interested in Safety II) This gives little help to the crew if faced with a similar or any other challenge.

Training programmes were consequently saturated with items that may not necessarily mitigate the real risks or enhance safety in modern air transport operations.

*Pic source https://hackernoon.com/technical-vs-non-technical-marketers-lets-end-the-snobbery-w7v37k1*

Furthermore, training approaches traditionally regarded non-technical skills (through Crew Resource Management courses) and technical flying skills (during simulator sessions) separately. Learning from past events, we have come to realize that air incidents and accidents rarely result from the improper use of a given skill alone, but rather involve a combination of both technical and non-technical aspects.

The training concept shift proposed under EBT is not simply to replace a sometimes-outdated set of critical events with a new set, but rather to use the events as a vehicle for developing and assessing crew performance across the range of behavioral competencies. In addition, EBT requires instructors and trainers to focus on the root causes of sub-standard behaviors, rather than merely asking a flight crew to repeat a maneuver with no real understanding as to why it was not successfully flown in the first instance.

It is very difficult, if not impossible, to foresee all plausible accident scenarios in today’s aviation system, which characterized by complexity and high reliability. EBT addresses this limitation by moving from pure scenario-based training to prioritizing the development and assessment of behavioral competencies, hence leading to improved training outcomes. The aim is that by mastering a finite number of defined competencies a pilot will be able to manage previously unseen potentially dangerous situations in flight.

*Picture sourced from https://www.ediweekly.com/55414-2/*

Under the EBT training concept, qualified flight simulation training devices (FSTDs) should be used to the maximum extent possible for assessing and developing crew competence. Crews should be exposed to a wide variety of situations that may be faced in line operations. In today’s high-fidelity simulator environment sophisticated training tools exist that are often not used effectively, as training regulatory requirements are oriented more significantly toward checking.

EBT seeks to redress the imbalance between training and checking as it recognizes that an assessment of competence is necessary, but once completed, pilots learn more effectively when being trained by competent instructors to perform tasks and manage events measured according to a given set of behavioral indicators, while not under pure test conditions.

The development of a baseline EBT program requires the determination by each air operator of critical training events based on data, the development of training scenarios and the definition of appropriate flight crew performance criteria when managing these events and scenarios.